Exploring the Truth Behind Calories and Weight Loss Dynamics
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding Caloric Dynamics
In the realm of weight management, proponents of the "Calories In/Calories Out" (CICO) theory often reference the First Law of Thermodynamics. This principle suggests that for weight loss to occur, the calories expended must surpass the calories consumed. They frequently illustrate this concept with a simple formula to clarify how weight reduction functions.
Image licensed via Canva.com
Intrigued by this theory, I decided to conduct an experiment to ascertain its validity in practical scenarios.
Step 1 involved acquiring a container with a one-liter capacity.
Step 2 required using a kitchen scale to zero out the weight of this empty container.
With these initial steps complete, I progressed to:
Step 3, boiling a pot of water to precisely 100°C. In the process, I humorously debunked the myth that “a watched pot never boils,” which left me eager to see the results of my actual experiment.
Step 4 consisted of filling the container with exactly one liter of water. I ensured the measurement was accurate by weighing the water, knowing that 1 liter equates to 1 kilogram. However, I realized I had neglected to zero out the weight of the container with the lid on it—back to Step 2.
Step 2-revised: I correctly zeroed the weight of both the container and its lid.
Repeating Steps 3 and 4 confirmed once more that a watched pot does boil.
Step 5 involved recording the weight of the container filled with water, which came to exactly 1,000 grams (or 1 kilogram).
Step 6 was straightforward: I set the container, brimming with 100°C water, aside to attend to other tasks for the day.
Image licensed via Canva.com
To highlight an important point, in nutritional science, a "Calorie" is defined as the energy required to elevate the temperature of 1 kilogram of water by 1°C. Hence, our container filled with 100°C water contained 100 Calories.
Step 7 involved measuring the water's temperature after about eight hours of letting it sit unattended. The temperature recorded was 18°C, which matched the ambient temperature of my apartment that day.
Step 8 was the final preparatory step: I turned on the scale, reset it to zero, and placed the container back on the scale. As anticipated, the weight remained at 1,000 grams.
This raised a perplexing question: How could the water have lost 82 Calories without a corresponding loss in weight? According to CICO advocates, there should have been a decrease in the water's mass.
Is the First Law of Thermodynamics flawed? Or perhaps the CICO proponents are misinterpreting mass changes through the lens of energy variations as indicated by Calories?
Section 1.1: The Confusion Between Mass and Energy
To clarify, the CICO camp is conflating the Law of Conservation of Mass—which relates specifically to mass—with the First Law of Thermodynamics, which pertains to energy.
Image licensed via Canva.com
This confusion leads to misunderstandings, as they are attempting to explain mass changes using energy shifts, which simply does not align—energy itself possesses no mass. Consequently, the container of water retained its mass despite losing energy.
Chapter 2: The Role of Mass in Weight Loss
Consider the dynamics of weight loss when following different dietary approaches. A low-carb diet has shown remarkable effectiveness for many individuals.
Before diving into specifics, it’s essential to note that the energy we derive from our food does not come from the physical mass of the food itself; rather, it originates from the chemical bonds that constitute the food's molecules.
When the body metabolizes a kilogram of fat, 840 grams exits as carbon dioxide, and 160 grams exits as water—summed together, this accounts for 1,000 grams or 1 kilogram, illustrating the Law of Conservation of Mass at work.
Now, let’s compare two individuals, Bill and Ted, who each consume a daily intake of 2,500 Calories. Bill opts for a High-Carb/Low-Fat diet, while Ted chooses a Low-Carb/High-Fat regimen.
For Bill's High-Carb/Low-Fat diet, which consists of 65% carbohydrates, 20% protein, and 15% fat, the breakdown is as follows:
- Carbs: 1,625 Calories (4 Calories/gram) = 406.24 grams
- Protein: 500 Calories (4 Calories/gram) = 125.00 grams
- Fat: 375 Calories (9 Calories/gram) = 41.67 grams
- Total Calories: 2,500; Total weight of food: 572.91 grams
Conversely, for Ted's Low-Carb/High-Fat diet, which includes 5% carbohydrates, 20% protein, and 75% fat, the calculations yield:
- Carbs: 125 Calories (4 Calories/gram) = 31.25 grams
- Protein: 500 Calories (4 Calories/gram) = 125.00 grams
- Fat: 1,875 Calories (9 Calories/gram) = 208.34 grams
- Total Calories: 2,500; Total weight of food: 364.59 grams
Thus, while both consume an equal caloric intake, Ted's low-carb approach leads to a daily reduction of about 200 grams of food. Over a week, this amounts to approximately 1.4 kilograms (or 3.3 pounds) less.
Ultimately, the focus should not be solely on Calories In/Calories Out but rather on the concept of Mass In/Mass Out.
Thank you for engaging with this article—hopefully, you found valuable insights within it.
With a paid subscription to Medium, you can access more of my writing and enjoy unlimited reading from countless Medium authors, all for about $5.00 a month!