Chapter 1: Understanding the Fight for Rights

Recently, I started watching "Amend: The Fight for America" on Netflix, and it's been both enlightening and motivating. The series delves into numerous Supreme Court cases and significant historical figures that I previously knew little about.

It highlights the struggles of various marginalized groups, including African Americans, women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and immigrants—each of whom has had to advocate for their rights in the U.S. However, there are other groups facing similar challenges, particularly those living in poverty, especially the homeless.

Too often, homeless individuals are viewed as less than human, frequently ignored by society. As a comedian, I've heard jokes about dating homeless individuals, with the absurdity of the situation serving as the punchline. It's striking how such humor is socially acceptable, unlike similar jokes about dating individuals from marginalized racial groups, which would likely invite backlash.

One figure from "Amend" who resonated with me is Estelle Griswold. She provided contraception to women despite it being illegal, fully aware of the potential repercussions. Her conviction that the law was unjust drove her to take action, which made me reconsider my own assumptions about those involved in Supreme Court cases. It’s intriguing to think that some individuals might intentionally challenge the law, creating the possibility for legal battles.

A recent brunch outing with my son reminded me of this issue. After his dentist appointment, we visited a Shari's—a diner similar to Denny's. I noticed a sign on the entrance prohibiting "oversized bags," seemingly aimed at deterring homeless patrons. Given its proximity to the airport, I doubt they would deny entry to travelers with luggage.

This situation brings to mind the legal implications of refusing service to homeless individuals. After all, just because someone lacks housing doesn't mean they can't afford a meal at Shari's. While I'm not currently homeless, and my attempt to feign homelessness for a legal challenge might not hold up in court, it raises the question of how many homeless individuals would be willing to protest in this manner.

It's disheartening that those who need to advocate for their rights often face numerous barriers that hinder their ability to do so. Moreover, I empathize with the employees who might have to enforce such discriminatory policies. Many of them earn low wages and could be struggling themselves.

Ultimately, I want to challenge the notion that anyone should experience homelessness or financial hardship. Many people with ample resources can spend hours in a café with just one purchase, while those with limited means deserve the same opportunity.

It seems businesses often refuse entry to homeless individuals, fearing it might deter wealthier customers. However, if all establishments were required to welcome homeless patrons, it could encourage business owners—many of whom have the means—to take action against homelessness.

While the solution isn't straightforward, preventing discrimination against homeless individuals could mark a significant step toward addressing this issue.

The first video titled "Millionaire Goes Homeless To Prove Anyone Can Make $1,000,000" explores the journey of a wealthy individual who temporarily experiences homelessness to highlight the challenges faced by those in such situations.

The second video, "North Carolina Shelter Sues for Right to Offer Private Charity on Private Property," examines the legal battle over a shelter's ability to provide assistance on private land, shedding light on the intersection of law, charity, and homelessness.