Understanding Secondary Indexes in System Design Interviews
Written on
Chapter 1: Introduction to Indexes
In the realm of system design interviews, grasping the concept of secondary indexes is crucial. Previously, we delved into the partitioning of data. However, when our access patterns involve fields beyond the primary key, it's essential to implement secondary indexes for those fields.
To begin, let's clarify the distinction between primary and secondary indexes.
A primary index is constructed based on a table's primary key, which consists of a collection of fields that together provide a unique identifier for each record. The records can be visualized as organized according to this primary key, enabling efficient searches via binary search. Conversely, a secondary index can be established on any field, regardless of whether it is unique across all records.
Section 1.1: Example of Primary vs. Secondary Index
Consider a scenario involving songs. If searches frequently utilize the song length, we can create a secondary index on the column that captures this length in seconds. Unlike a primary index, which uniquely identifies records, a secondary index may not do so; for instance, multiple songs could share the same duration, such as 300 seconds (5 minutes). However, we can assign a unique, incrementing ID to each song, forming the primary key.
Section 1.2: Partitioning Secondary Indexes
When data is distributed across multiple nodes, creating secondary indexes requires two distinct strategies: document-based partitioning and term-based partitioning.
Subsection 1.2.1: Document-Based Partitioning
In document-based partitioning, a secondary index is maintained for the documents residing on the same node as the index itself. Referred to as a local index, this type of partitioning ensures that each partition is accountable only for the documents it contains, disregarding those in other partitions.
For instance, in our song dataset, we might segment the data based on filename and then implement a secondary index on song length. Each partition could cover a specific range, such as [A — E] for the first partition and [F — J] for the second.
The advantage here is that any updates to a record are reflected solely within the relevant partition. However, querying requires access to all partitions, which can be resource-intensive.
Subsection 1.2.2: Term-Based Partitioning
In contrast, term-based partitioning involves a global index that spans all nodes, with the index itself divided among those nodes. For example, if we create a secondary index based on song length, we might categorize lengths into partitions. If the maximum song length is 20 minutes (1200 seconds), we can distribute these values among five nodes, with each node responsible for specific ranges.
The benefit of this method is that queries for particular values are directed to a single node, eliminating the need for multiple queries across nodes. However, this method poses challenges, as updates to records on one node may necessitate corresponding updates to the global index on another node, potentially leading to synchronization issues.
Chapter 2: Conclusion
Understanding the nuances of secondary indexes and their partitioning strategies is vital for excelling in system design interviews. By mastering these concepts, candidates can effectively demonstrate their knowledge and problem-solving abilities in data management scenarios.